NHSQueue

Worcestershire Acute Hospitals vs The Royal Wolverhampton

Within 18 Weeks

57.3%

Total Waiting

55,079

CQC Rating

Not rated

A&E 4hr

54.8%

Within 18 Weeks

56.3%

Total Waiting

75,527

CQC Rating

Not rated

A&E 4hr

64.9%

% Within 18 Weeks Trend

Loading chart...

By Specialty

SpecialtyWorcestershire Acute HospitalsThe Royal WolverhamptonBetter
ENT (Ear, Nose & Throat)43.5%48.5%The Royal Wolverhampton
Ophthalmology67.6%56.4%Worcestershire Acute Hospitals
Gynaecology54.4%49.8%Worcestershire Acute Hospitals
Trauma & Orthopaedics41.3%62.9%The Royal Wolverhampton
Urology55.0%46.8%Worcestershire Acute Hospitals
Other Medical64.3%67.5%The Royal Wolverhampton
General Surgery52.9%25.4%Worcestershire Acute Hospitals
Oral Surgery36.4%37.8%The Royal Wolverhampton
Gastroenterology68.8%60.1%Worcestershire Acute Hospitals
Other Surgical76.8%74.3%Worcestershire Acute Hospitals
Dermatology57.9%73.2%The Royal Wolverhampton
Cardiology73.5%58.1%Worcestershire Acute Hospitals
Respiratory Medicine60.5%84.0%The Royal Wolverhampton
Other Services74.7%92.1%The Royal Wolverhampton
Neurology87.6%58.4%Worcestershire Acute Hospitals
Rheumatology86.1%73.1%Worcestershire Acute Hospitals
General Medicine99.1%100.0%The Royal Wolverhampton
Elderly Medicine96.2%96.1%Worcestershire Acute Hospitals
Paediatrics89.2%47.6%Worcestershire Acute Hospitals
Plastic Surgery81.8%74.5%Worcestershire Acute Hospitals

Summary

Worcestershire Acute Hospitals has better overall performance, with 57.3% of patients seen within 18 weeks compared to 56.3% at The Royal Wolverhampton. Across 20 shared specialties, Worcestershire Acute Hospitals leads in 12 and The Royal Wolverhampton leads in 8.