NHSGuide

The Royal Wolverhampton vs Worcestershire Acute Hospitals

Within 18 Weeks

56.3%

Total Waiting

75,527

CQC Rating

Not rated

A&E 4hr

64.9%

Within 18 Weeks

57.3%

Total Waiting

55,079

CQC Rating

Not rated

A&E 4hr

54.8%

% Within 18 Weeks Trend

Loading chart...

By Specialty

SpecialtyThe Royal WolverhamptonWorcestershire Acute HospitalsBetter
Ophthalmology56.4%67.6%Worcestershire Acute Hospitals
Urology46.8%55.0%Worcestershire Acute Hospitals
Trauma & Orthopaedics62.9%41.3%The Royal Wolverhampton
Other Medical67.5%64.3%The Royal Wolverhampton
ENT (Ear, Nose & Throat)48.5%43.5%The Royal Wolverhampton
Gynaecology49.8%54.4%Worcestershire Acute Hospitals
Other Surgical74.3%76.8%Worcestershire Acute Hospitals
Cardiology58.1%73.5%Worcestershire Acute Hospitals
Gastroenterology60.1%68.8%Worcestershire Acute Hospitals
Oral Surgery37.8%36.4%The Royal Wolverhampton
General Surgery25.4%52.9%Worcestershire Acute Hospitals
Neurology58.4%87.6%Worcestershire Acute Hospitals
Respiratory Medicine84.0%60.5%The Royal Wolverhampton
Rheumatology73.1%86.1%Worcestershire Acute Hospitals
Paediatrics47.6%89.2%Worcestershire Acute Hospitals
Dermatology73.2%57.9%The Royal Wolverhampton
Other Services92.1%74.7%The Royal Wolverhampton
Plastic Surgery74.5%81.8%Worcestershire Acute Hospitals
Elderly Medicine96.1%96.2%Worcestershire Acute Hospitals
General Medicine100.0%99.1%The Royal Wolverhampton

Summary

Worcestershire Acute Hospitals has better overall performance, with 57.3% of patients seen within 18 weeks compared to 56.3% at The Royal Wolverhampton. Across 20 shared specialties, The Royal Wolverhampton leads in 8 and Worcestershire Acute Hospitals leads in 12.