NHSGuide

The Royal Wolverhampton vs University Hospitals of North Midlands

Within 18 Weeks

56.3%

Total Waiting

75,527

CQC Rating

Not rated

A&E 4hr

64.9%

Within 18 Weeks

61.9%

Total Waiting

64,036

CQC Rating

Not rated

A&E 4hr

44.2%

% Within 18 Weeks Trend

Loading chart...

By Specialty

SpecialtyThe Royal WolverhamptonUniversity Hospitals of North MidlandsBetter
Ophthalmology56.4%56.6%University Hospitals of North Midlands
Urology46.8%61.5%University Hospitals of North Midlands
Trauma & Orthopaedics62.9%52.7%The Royal Wolverhampton
Other Medical67.5%68.1%University Hospitals of North Midlands
ENT (Ear, Nose & Throat)48.5%50.0%University Hospitals of North Midlands
Gynaecology49.8%57.8%University Hospitals of North Midlands
Other Surgical74.3%100.0%University Hospitals of North Midlands
Cardiology58.1%65.2%University Hospitals of North Midlands
Gastroenterology60.1%67.0%University Hospitals of North Midlands
Oral Surgery37.8%52.4%University Hospitals of North Midlands
General Surgery25.4%62.3%University Hospitals of North Midlands
Neurology58.4%65.7%University Hospitals of North Midlands
Respiratory Medicine84.0%72.0%The Royal Wolverhampton
Rheumatology73.1%100.0%University Hospitals of North Midlands
Paediatrics47.6%80.3%University Hospitals of North Midlands
Dermatology73.2%72.4%The Royal Wolverhampton
Other Services92.1%90.5%The Royal Wolverhampton
Plastic Surgery74.5%43.9%The Royal Wolverhampton
Elderly Medicine96.1%95.3%The Royal Wolverhampton

Summary

University Hospitals of North Midlands has better overall performance, with 61.9% of patients seen within 18 weeks compared to 56.3% at The Royal Wolverhampton. Across 19 shared specialties, The Royal Wolverhampton leads in 6 and University Hospitals of North Midlands leads in 13.