NHSQueue

University Hospitals of North Midlands vs The Royal Wolverhampton

Within 18 Weeks

61.9%

Total Waiting

64,036

CQC Rating

Not rated

A&E 4hr

44.2%

Within 18 Weeks

56.3%

Total Waiting

75,527

CQC Rating

Not rated

A&E 4hr

64.9%

% Within 18 Weeks Trend

Loading chart...

By Specialty

SpecialtyUniversity Hospitals of North MidlandsThe Royal WolverhamptonBetter
General Surgery62.3%25.4%University Hospitals of North Midlands
Other Medical68.1%67.5%University Hospitals of North Midlands
Trauma & Orthopaedics52.7%62.9%The Royal Wolverhampton
Ophthalmology56.6%56.4%University Hospitals of North Midlands
Cardiology65.2%58.1%University Hospitals of North Midlands
Respiratory Medicine72.0%84.0%The Royal Wolverhampton
Neurology65.7%58.4%University Hospitals of North Midlands
Gastroenterology67.0%60.1%University Hospitals of North Midlands
Gynaecology57.8%49.8%University Hospitals of North Midlands
ENT (Ear, Nose & Throat)50.0%48.5%University Hospitals of North Midlands
Urology61.5%46.8%University Hospitals of North Midlands
Oral Surgery52.4%37.8%University Hospitals of North Midlands
Paediatrics80.3%47.6%University Hospitals of North Midlands
Dermatology72.4%73.2%The Royal Wolverhampton
Plastic Surgery43.9%74.5%The Royal Wolverhampton
Other Services90.5%92.1%The Royal Wolverhampton
Elderly Medicine95.3%96.1%The Royal Wolverhampton
Other Surgical100.0%74.3%University Hospitals of North Midlands
Rheumatology100.0%73.1%University Hospitals of North Midlands

Summary

University Hospitals of North Midlands has better overall performance, with 61.9% of patients seen within 18 weeks compared to 56.3% at The Royal Wolverhampton. Across 19 shared specialties, University Hospitals of North Midlands leads in 13 and The Royal Wolverhampton leads in 6.