NHSQueue

Kingston and Richmond vs Royal Free London

Within 18 Weeks

58.0%

Total Waiting

44,870

CQC Rating

Not rated

A&E 4hr

46.3%

Within 18 Weeks

59.2%

Total Waiting

139,512

CQC Rating

RI

A&E 4hr

66.8%

% Within 18 Weeks Trend

Loading chart...

By Specialty

SpecialtyKingston and RichmondRoyal Free LondonBetter
Other Surgical50.8%57.7%Royal Free London
Ophthalmology69.1%67.8%Kingston and Richmond
Gynaecology60.5%58.2%Kingston and Richmond
ENT (Ear, Nose & Throat)45.6%56.3%Royal Free London
Dermatology45.5%62.4%Royal Free London
Gastroenterology56.9%61.3%Royal Free London
Trauma & Orthopaedics58.7%46.0%Kingston and Richmond
Cardiology57.1%59.2%Royal Free London
Urology79.0%54.0%Kingston and Richmond
Paediatrics67.4%55.7%Kingston and Richmond
General Surgery37.4%44.8%Royal Free London
Other Medical70.4%70.2%Kingston and Richmond
Oral Surgery87.7%0.0%Kingston and Richmond
Respiratory Medicine62.4%69.9%Royal Free London
Neurology79.4%59.0%Kingston and Richmond
General Medicine31.9%72.1%Royal Free London
Rheumatology75.5%51.5%Kingston and Richmond
Plastic Surgery73.7%56.2%Kingston and Richmond
Other Services24.1%65.3%Royal Free London
Elderly Medicine100.0%97.3%Kingston and Richmond

Summary

Royal Free London has better overall performance, with 59.2% of patients seen within 18 weeks compared to 58.0% at Kingston and Richmond. Across 20 shared specialties, Kingston and Richmond leads in 11 and Royal Free London leads in 9.