NHSQueue

Kingston and Richmond vs Barts Health

Within 18 Weeks

58.0%

Total Waiting

44,870

CQC Rating

Not rated

A&E 4hr

46.3%

Within 18 Weeks

56.8%

Total Waiting

131,544

CQC Rating

Inadequate

A&E 4hr

57.9%

% Within 18 Weeks Trend

Loading chart...

By Specialty

SpecialtyKingston and RichmondBarts HealthBetter
Other Surgical50.8%60.2%Barts Health
Ophthalmology69.1%67.8%Kingston and Richmond
Gynaecology60.5%59.7%Kingston and Richmond
ENT (Ear, Nose & Throat)45.6%46.2%Barts Health
Dermatology45.5%49.2%Barts Health
Gastroenterology56.9%59.2%Barts Health
Trauma & Orthopaedics58.7%52.2%Kingston and Richmond
Cardiology57.1%63.6%Barts Health
Urology79.0%51.3%Kingston and Richmond
Paediatrics67.4%52.0%Kingston and Richmond
General Surgery37.4%51.6%Barts Health
Other Medical70.4%63.7%Kingston and Richmond
Oral Surgery87.7%53.9%Kingston and Richmond
Respiratory Medicine62.4%52.5%Kingston and Richmond
Neurology79.4%49.7%Kingston and Richmond
General Medicine31.9%59.8%Barts Health
Rheumatology75.5%76.5%Barts Health
Plastic Surgery73.7%43.3%Kingston and Richmond
Other Services24.1%61.4%Barts Health
Elderly Medicine100.0%84.0%Kingston and Richmond

Summary

Kingston and Richmond has better overall performance, with 58.0% of patients seen within 18 weeks compared to 56.8% at Barts Health. Across 20 shared specialties, Kingston and Richmond leads in 11 and Barts Health leads in 9.