NHSQueue

George Eliot Hospital vs The Royal Wolverhampton

Within 18 Weeks

63.6%

Total Waiting

18,140

CQC Rating

Not rated

A&E 4hr

75.6%

Within 18 Weeks

56.3%

Total Waiting

75,527

CQC Rating

Not rated

A&E 4hr

64.9%

% Within 18 Weeks Trend

Loading chart...

By Specialty

SpecialtyGeorge Eliot HospitalThe Royal WolverhamptonBetter
ENT (Ear, Nose & Throat)38.8%48.5%The Royal Wolverhampton
Gynaecology58.9%49.8%George Eliot Hospital
Trauma & Orthopaedics71.7%62.9%George Eliot Hospital
Other Services45.4%92.1%The Royal Wolverhampton
Urology73.6%46.8%George Eliot Hospital
General Surgery49.0%25.4%George Eliot Hospital
Other Surgical63.2%74.3%The Royal Wolverhampton
Cardiology76.3%58.1%George Eliot Hospital
Ophthalmology61.6%56.4%George Eliot Hospital
Other Medical80.7%67.5%George Eliot Hospital
Gastroenterology77.1%60.1%George Eliot Hospital
Oral Surgery67.2%37.8%George Eliot Hospital
Respiratory Medicine76.1%84.0%The Royal Wolverhampton
Paediatrics76.2%47.6%George Eliot Hospital
Rheumatology94.6%73.1%George Eliot Hospital
General Medicine86.3%100.0%The Royal Wolverhampton
Plastic Surgery81.6%74.5%George Eliot Hospital
Elderly Medicine92.4%96.1%The Royal Wolverhampton

Summary

George Eliot Hospital has better overall performance, with 63.6% of patients seen within 18 weeks compared to 56.3% at The Royal Wolverhampton. Across 18 shared specialties, George Eliot Hospital leads in 12 and The Royal Wolverhampton leads in 6.