NHSQueue

George Eliot Hospital vs University Hospitals of North Midlands

Within 18 Weeks

63.6%

Total Waiting

18,140

CQC Rating

Not rated

A&E 4hr

75.6%

Within 18 Weeks

61.9%

Total Waiting

64,036

CQC Rating

Not rated

A&E 4hr

44.2%

% Within 18 Weeks Trend

Loading chart...

By Specialty

SpecialtyGeorge Eliot HospitalUniversity Hospitals of North MidlandsBetter
ENT (Ear, Nose & Throat)38.8%50.0%University Hospitals of North Midlands
Gynaecology58.9%57.8%George Eliot Hospital
Trauma & Orthopaedics71.7%52.7%George Eliot Hospital
Other Services45.4%90.5%University Hospitals of North Midlands
Urology73.6%61.5%George Eliot Hospital
General Surgery49.0%62.3%University Hospitals of North Midlands
Other Surgical63.2%100.0%University Hospitals of North Midlands
Cardiology76.3%65.2%George Eliot Hospital
Ophthalmology61.6%56.6%George Eliot Hospital
Other Medical80.7%68.1%George Eliot Hospital
Gastroenterology77.1%67.0%George Eliot Hospital
Oral Surgery67.2%52.4%George Eliot Hospital
Respiratory Medicine76.1%72.0%George Eliot Hospital
Paediatrics76.2%80.3%University Hospitals of North Midlands
Rheumatology94.6%100.0%University Hospitals of North Midlands
Plastic Surgery81.6%43.9%George Eliot Hospital
Elderly Medicine92.4%95.3%University Hospitals of North Midlands

Summary

George Eliot Hospital has better overall performance, with 63.6% of patients seen within 18 weeks compared to 61.9% at University Hospitals of North Midlands. Across 17 shared specialties, George Eliot Hospital leads in 10 and University Hospitals of North Midlands leads in 7.