BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S vs THE ROYAL WOLVERHAMPTON
Within 18 Weeks
64.8%
Total Waiting
22,008
Median Wait
12.5 weeks
A&E 4hr
83.7%
Within 18 Weeks
60.4%
Total Waiting
73,165
Median Wait
14.5 weeks
A&E 4hr
80.5%
By Specialty
| Specialty | BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S | THE ROYAL WOLVERHAMPTON | Better |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paediatrics | 65.2% | 55.6% | BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S |
| Other Medical | 68.3% | 71.0% | THE ROYAL WOLVERHAMPTON |
| Gynaecology | 60.0% | 55.1% | BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S |
| Other Services | 79.1% | 48.9% | BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S |
| Other Surgical | 43.9% | 63.8% | THE ROYAL WOLVERHAMPTON |
| ENT (Ear, Nose & Throat) | 0.0% | 49.7% | THE ROYAL WOLVERHAMPTON |
| Urology | 0.0% | 50.2% | THE ROYAL WOLVERHAMPTON |
| Trauma & Orthopaedics | 100.0% | 65.7% | BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S |
Summary
BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S has the higher overall figure, with 64.8% of incomplete pathways within 18 weeks compared with 60.4% at THE ROYAL WOLVERHAMPTON. Across 8 shared specialties, BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S leads in 4 and THE ROYAL WOLVERHAMPTON leads in 4.