Birmingham Women's and Children's vs The Royal Wolverhampton
Within 18 Weeks
59.8%
Total Waiting
9,394
CQC Rating
Not ratedA&E 4hr
77.0%
Within 18 Weeks
56.3%
Total Waiting
75,527
CQC Rating
Not ratedA&E 4hr
64.9%
% Within 18 Weeks Trend
Loading chart...
By Specialty
| Specialty | Birmingham Women's and Children's | The Royal Wolverhampton | Better |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paediatrics | 59.3% | 47.6% | Birmingham Women's and Children's |
| Other Medical | 66.5% | 67.5% | The Royal Wolverhampton |
| Gynaecology | 46.6% | 49.8% | The Royal Wolverhampton |
| Other Services | 65.4% | 92.1% | The Royal Wolverhampton |
| Other Surgical | 48.6% | 74.3% | The Royal Wolverhampton |
| Ophthalmology | 0.0% | 56.4% | The Royal Wolverhampton |
Summary
Birmingham Women's and Children's has better overall performance, with 59.8% of patients seen within 18 weeks compared to 56.3% at The Royal Wolverhampton. Across 6 shared specialties, Birmingham Women's and Children's leads in 1 and The Royal Wolverhampton leads in 5.