NHSQueue

University Hospitals Birmingham vs The Royal Wolverhampton

Within 18 Weeks

62.0%

Total Waiting

12,406

CQC Rating

Not rated

A&E 4hr

58.2%

Within 18 Weeks

56.3%

Total Waiting

75,527

CQC Rating

Not rated

A&E 4hr

64.9%

% Within 18 Weeks Trend

Loading chart...

By Specialty

SpecialtyUniversity Hospitals BirminghamThe Royal WolverhamptonBetter
Other Medical73.6%67.5%University Hospitals Birmingham
Ophthalmology46.9%56.4%The Royal Wolverhampton
Neurology55.1%58.4%The Royal Wolverhampton
ENT (Ear, Nose & Throat)52.1%48.5%University Hospitals Birmingham
Urology55.5%46.8%University Hospitals Birmingham
Other Surgical66.6%74.3%The Royal Wolverhampton
Oral Surgery45.5%37.8%University Hospitals Birmingham
Dermatology74.5%73.2%University Hospitals Birmingham
Cardiology77.2%58.1%University Hospitals Birmingham
Gastroenterology63.1%60.1%University Hospitals Birmingham
General Surgery58.7%25.4%University Hospitals Birmingham
Respiratory Medicine76.3%84.0%The Royal Wolverhampton
Gynaecology55.2%49.8%University Hospitals Birmingham
Trauma & Orthopaedics66.6%62.9%University Hospitals Birmingham
Other Services73.8%92.1%The Royal Wolverhampton
Plastic Surgery65.4%74.5%The Royal Wolverhampton
Paediatrics56.3%47.6%University Hospitals Birmingham
Rheumatology83.5%73.1%University Hospitals Birmingham
Elderly Medicine100.0%96.1%University Hospitals Birmingham
General Medicine100.0%100.0%Tie

Summary

University Hospitals Birmingham has better overall performance, with 62.0% of patients seen within 18 weeks compared to 56.3% at The Royal Wolverhampton. Across 20 shared specialties, University Hospitals Birmingham leads in 13 and The Royal Wolverhampton leads in 6.